National Geographic: ‘Our coverage was racist’

US & Canada

US & Canada

National Geographic: ‘Our coverage was racist’

Share this with Facebook

Share this with Twitter

Share this with Messenger

Share this with Messenger

Share this with Email

Share

Share this with
These are external links and will open in a new window

Email
Share this with Email

Facebook
Share this with Facebook

Messenger
Share this with Messenger

Messenger
Share this with Messenger

Twitter
Share this with Twitter

Pinterest
Share this with Pinterest

WhatsApp
Share this with WhatsApp

LinkedIn
Share this with LinkedIn

Copy this link
Read more about sharing.
These are external links and will open in a new window

Image copyright
SHUTTERSTOCK

Image caption

National Geographic’s first edition was in 1888

US magazine National Geographic says its past coverage of people around the world was racist.It ignored non-white Americans and showed different groups as exotic or savage, propagating “every type of cliché”, editor Susan Goldberg said.The magazine’s April edition is dedicated to race and it has asked a historian to look at past issues.It decided to re-examine its coverage to mark 50 years since civil rights leader Martin Luther King was murdered.”Let’s confront today’s shameful use of racism as a political strategy and prove we are better than this,” Ms Goldberg wrote in an editorial entitled “For Decades, Our Coverage Was Racist”.Ms Goldberg said some of the magazine’s archive material left her “speechless”, including a 1916 photo of Australian Aborigines with the caption “South Australian Blackfellows: These savages rank lowest in intelligence of all human beings”.

Skip Twitter post by @NatGeo

Our April issue is devoted to exploring race—how it defines, separates and unites us. Read the story behind the cover: https://t.co/PPTVg3UpM8 pic.twitter.com/5kunxfDrHt— National Geographic (@NatGeo) March 12, 2018

End of Twitter post by @NatGeo

Asked to examine its coverage, University of Virginia associate professor John Edwin Mason said National Geographic had served only to reinforce racist attitudes in a magazine with “tremendous authority”.He showed that until the 1970s the magazine ignored non-white Americans, only showing them as labourers or domestic staff.You may also be interested in:#OscarsSoWhite tweeter on race and change
Harry and Meghan letter ‘race hate crime’
Mixed-race Joan of Arc faces online abuse
Jeff Sessions in ‘Anglo’ remark race row
Prof Mason also pointed to photos of natives encountering Western technology – creating an “us-and-them” split between “civilized and uncivilized” – and the excessive numbers of photos of Pacific-island women.He compared a piece covering apartheid-era South Africa in 1962 – which barely mentions any problems – and a second piece from 1977, which shows opposition to the regime by black leaders.”It’s not a perfect article, but it acknowledges the oppression,” Prof Mason wrote.
Image copyright
AFP/Getty

Image caption

The 50th anniversary of Martin Luther King’s assassination will be on 4 April

But the historian also acknowledged the good work the magazine did even during this period in showing its readers the wider world.”It’s possible to say that a magazine can open people’s eyes at the same time it closes them,” he said.National Geographic: Key factsThe magazine’s first edition came out in September 1888 after formation of non-profit education group, the National Geographic Society
Circulation of over six million worldwide, down from 12 million in the late 1980s
Originally a text magazine before adopting photo coverage in January 1905 issue
1982 cover altered a photo of the pyramids at Giza, leading to the first digital Photoshop scandal
June 1985 cover was the famous green-eyed Afghan Girl – a refugee child in Pakistan

Elsewhere on the BBC